Imran Khalid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29674 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2016 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Imran Khalid, Son of Azmullah, Resident of Village-Azad Nagar, Madhopur, P.S.-Majhaulia, District-West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 152 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the written report that the petitioner gave iron blow on the head of the informant causing bleeding injury. The injury report has been annexed as Annexure-2 wherein the Doctor has found simple injury and C.T. Scan of the head was found to be normal.

It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29674 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 152 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T