Sri Kant Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47501 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2015 Thana -DHOLBAJJA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Sri Kant Mandal, Son of Patho Mandal, Resident of Village- Ganganagar Kadwa, P.S.- Dholbazza, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha,Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 307, 353, 427 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Dholbajja (Kadwa) P.S. Case No. 15 of 2015.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event the accusation that the petitioner along with one Fantush Mandal threw chilly powder in the informant's eyes is belied from the injury report which discloses that the injury has been caused by hard and blunt substance.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47501 of 2015 (2) dt.03-11-2015 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Gupta, learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Naugachia, District Bhagalpur, in connection with Dholbajja (Kadwa) P.S. Case No. 15 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions: (i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present as and when required during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U T