Anil Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32072 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-653 Year-2020 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Anil Ram Son of Late Musahi Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

2.

Kalika Ram Son of Late Ashrafi Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

3.

Inder Ram Son of Late Ashrfi Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

4.

Santosh Ram Son of Kalika Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

5.

Bullet Ram Son of Nayak Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

6.

Manoj Ram Son of Nayak Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

7.

Shiv Kumar Ram Son of Binayak Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

8.

Haresh Ram Son of Late Musahi Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

9.

Deo Kumar Ram Son of Binayak Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

10.

Shatrudhan Ram Son of Binayak Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

11.

Binda Ram Son of Man Haran Ram Resident of Village - Sardarganj Bisunpura, P.S. - Mashrak, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-06-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32072 of 2021(2) dt.08-06-2022 2/2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of this anticipatory bail application the petitioners have surrendered before the learned court below itself, and as such, the present bail application has become infructuous. Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T