Mukesh Kr Singh@Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23721 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2021 Thana- DHANSOI District- Buxar ====================================================== MUKESH KR SINGH@MUKESH KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Ganga Sagar Singh Resident of Village - Adarsh Nagar, P.S.- Buxar (T), Distt.- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 363, 366(A), 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, one Aditya Kumar attempted forcibly to kidnap the minor daughter of the informant when she was returning from temple.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23721 of 2022(2) dt.30-08-2022 2/2 petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but later on the statement of the victim was recorded after three months under section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has taken the name of the petitioner. There is a case and counter-case between the parties. Petitioner has two criminal antecedent, which is also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the victim is a minor. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the victim is a minor, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

This application is accordingly, dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T