Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.78268 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Verma Son of Vijay Verma, Resident of VillageMogalpura Jamuni Rai, Kuan, Renter of Rajkumar Verma, P.S.- Khajekallan, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Special (N.D.P.S.) Case No.81/18 arising out of Khajekallan P.S. Case No. 243/18 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20/22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of 14 Puria of smack from his possession. However, weight has not been disclosed either in the F.I.R. or in the seizure list. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case at the behest of his enemies. He is an employee working in private company and has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78268 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 7th, Patna in connection with Special (N.D.P.S.) Case No.81/18 arising out of Khajekallan P.S. Case No. 243/18, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T