Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24738 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2026 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Kundan Kumar Son of Suresh Singh Resident of Bihta High Bridge, psBihta, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jitender Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bihta PS Case No. 69 of 2026 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 303 (2)/317 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pending in the Court of learned ACJM II, Danapur.
3. The petitioner is alleged to have snatched the mobile phone of the informant. The FIR records that earlier also the petitioner and co-accused Sudhir Kumar had stolen a bike for which Bihta PS Case No 434 dated 06.05.2023 was registered and they were part of the gang.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and is in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24738 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 custody since 22.01.2026.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering that the allegation against the petitioner is of snatching of mobile phone for which he is in custody since 22.01.2026, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bihta PS Case No. 69 of 2026.
8. However, the Court below will accept the bail bond of the petitioner only after verification of the criminal antecedent which he claims to be fair.
(Ansul, J) M.E.H./- U T