Serajul Haque @ Serajul Haque Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28277 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2017 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Serajul Haque @ Serajul Haque Ansari, Son of Feku Miyan , Resident of Village- Tuniya Ansari Tola, Police Station- Manuapul (O.P.) DistrictWest Champaran.
2. Afsana Khatoon , Daughter of Serajul Haque, Residnet of VillageRamnagar Bankat, Police Station- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran. 3.Shabana Khatoon, daughter of Serajul Haque, resident of village- Tuniya Ansari Tola, Police Station Manuapul (O.P.) District, West Champaran
4. Aashiya Praveen, wife of Arman Ansaari, resident of village- Jaukatiya, Police Station, Majhauliya, District, West Champaran .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7, Advocate For the State : Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 342, 323, 307, 498(A), 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that allegation is general and omnibus in nature. It is apparent from the order of the Sessions Judge dated 20.05.2017 rejecting the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28277 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017 2 / 2 anticipatory bail application of these petitioners, that it has been stated on behalf of the wife that if her husband undertakes on bond that he will guarantee her safety then she is ready to live with her husband. It is contended that petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is Nanad and petitioner nos.3 and 4 are married Nanadas of the informant and if they are sent to custody then there would be no likelihood of restoration of matrimonial tie. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in Muffasil (Manuapul) P.S. Case No. 56 of 2017, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Betttiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under subsection(2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dr.