Chandan Kumar Barnwal @ Chandan Barnwal v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1513 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3375 Year-2014 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Barnwal @ Chandan Barnwal, son of Vidya Sagar Barnwal @ Vidya Sagar Prasad, Resident of Village - Mathiya Hardo, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State Of Bihar and Anr Bihar

2. Biresh Kumar Madhesiya Gaurishankar Sah Resident of Village - Mathiya Hardo, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2019 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint P.S.Case No. 3375 of 2014 registered under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he in association with co-accused had launched a company namely Swabhumi Real Estate India Ltd. And used to allure people to deposit in their company for getting good interest and profit and petitioner and other co-accused came to the complainant and offered him a job of agent on incentive of 5% to collect money and as such he deposited 50,000/- in the name of security money. Thereafter complainant started working but the company stopped commission and refused to give money to him and closed company.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1513 of 2019(2) dt.23-01-2019 2/2 Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact a complaint has already been lodged against the complainant and to save his skin he has lodged this false case against the petitioner.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, if petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order, and if possible on the same day.

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U