← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77998/2018bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-02Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77998 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2018 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Rahul Kumar, S/o Ranjan Kumar Sharma, R/o Vill.- Sikandarpur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ansul For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahtash Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bihta P.S. Case No. 597 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1 giving a liberty to renew his prayer after six months in jail custody.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77998 of 2018(2) dt.02-01-2019 2/2 Case No. 597 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T