Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25591/2024dismissed

Dilip Singh Bhokta v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-24Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25591 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2023 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Dilip Singh Bhokta Ramdhyan Singh Bhokta R/o- Village- Baratand, PSBankey Bazar, Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Roshanganj (Bankey Bazar) P.S. Case No. 310 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the IPC.

3. The informant is the son of the deceased. As per allegation, the father of the informant was sleeping in a hut, situated in his field. The informant came to know that someone had murdered is father. He saw that someone committed murder of his father by using axe and iron rod. It has further been alleged that 4-5 days prior to the occurrence, the petitioner had threatened to kill the deceased.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25591 of 2024(3) dt.24-07-2024 2/2

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is nothing against the petitioner in the entire case diary except his confessional statement. It has also been submitted that none had seen the occurrence and the name of the petitioner has figured only on suspicion.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that during course of investigation, the petitioner has given vivid description of the murder in his confessional statement.

6. At the instance of the petitioner, blood-stained axe was recovered. From perusal of paragraph 9 of the case diary, it appears that the blood-stained axe was recovered at the instance of the petitioner.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, which is hereby rejected.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T