Ronald Niraj Sones v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1180 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12564 of 2005 ====================================================== Ronald Niraj Sones S/O Late Lorence Sones, resident of village Majhaulia, P.O. Khabra, P.S. Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Commissioner cum Secretary Sri Depak Kumar Department of Health and Family Welfare, New Secretariat, Patna1.

2. Mr. Surendra Prasad, Director- in-Chief, Department of Health and Family Welfare, New Secretariat, Patna-1.

3. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sinha, Principal, Shree Krishna Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarpur.

4. Mr. (Dr.) Jawahar Prasad, Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Munger, District Munger.

5. Mr. (Dr.) Birendra Kumar Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Begusarai, District Begusarai.

6. Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna-1. .... .... O.P/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.1, Advocate. For the O.P/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 22-06-2015 Having regard to the fact that there was no firm direction given by this Court and there were so many suppositions in the order giving liberty to the petitioner to lead evidence in support of his claim, this Court would not find any reason to initiate a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties. None-the-less, if the petitioner can still demonstrate and establish his claim before the Principal of the Sri Krishna Medical College, Muzaffarpur (hereinafter referred to as 'the College'), he may do so and the Principal of the College should

Patna High Court MJC No.1180 of 2014 (2) dt.22-06-2015 2/2 examine and decide the same in accordance with law and the observations made earlier in the order dated 23.07.2007 in C.W.J.C. No. 12564 of 2005.

It is, however, again made it clear that this Court, on account of claim of the petitioner being very stale, cannot issue any firm direction and, therefore, it would not be open for the petitioner now to move under contempt jurisdiction. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U