Abhimanyu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6906 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Abhimanyu Kumar son of Shree Nawal Kishore Singh resident of MohallaChhota Bariyarpur Ward No- 37, P.S. Chhatauni, P.O.- Motihari Court, District- East Champaran.

2.

Madhusudan Kumar Singh son of Surendra Kumar Singh resident of villagePataura, P.O.- Pataura, P.S.- Muffasil, District- East Champaran. 3.

Biresh Nath Kumar son of Rambabu Prasad resident of Mohalla- Jagiraha Bijabri, P.O.- Bhorasahan, P.S.- Jitna, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director-in- Chief, Deptt. of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The State Health Society Bihar, Patna through the Executive Director. 5.

The Executive Director, State Health Society Bihar, Patna. 6.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 7.

District Health Society, East Champaran, Motihari. 8.

Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Society, East Champaran, Motihari.

9.

Urmila International Service Private Limited, through its Managing Director, having its office at 31/A, 1st Floor, Banke Bihari Sadar, S.K. Puri, Boring Road, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.D.Yadav, AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-07-2020 Heard Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S.D.Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General No. 9, for the State. Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the case of the petitioners is in active consideration of the respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6906 of 2020(2) dt.03-07-2020 2/2 In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to pursue their claim before the authority concerned. If the grievance of the petitioners is not redressed by the respondents, the petitioners may have liberty to approach this Court again.

With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U