Ashish Kumar Jha @ Ramlala v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23386 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2021 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ashish Kumar Jha @ Ramlala S/O Late Shubh Chandra Jha Resident Of Village- Teotha, P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani, At Present Anand Vihar Colony, East Gola Road Near St.Karens High School P.S.- Danapur, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 188, 341, 342, 323, 332, 353, 283 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 9 of the Bihar Control of the Use and Play of Loudspeaker Act, 1955.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute between Jageshwar and Vivek with regard to election, firing was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23386 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/3 done in which Vivek received gunshot injury, thereafter his supporters blocked the road from 10:00 AM to 02:00 PM causing inconvenience to the citizens and even obstructed the police personnel from discharging their official duties.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that allegation is of blocking the road and creating ruckus, but then no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 255 of 2021 subject

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23386 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 3/3 to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T