← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/437/2019withdrawn

Neetu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-12The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.437 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13513 of 2018 ====================================================== Neetu Kumari Wife of Sri Subhankar Kumar Resident of Village and P.O. Rupauli, P.S. Rupauli, District Purnea, Ex-Pramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Rupauli, District - Purnea.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The District Magistrate, Purnea District-Purnea 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhamdaha District-Purnea 6.

The Block Development Officer, Rupauli cum Executive Officer Block Panchayat Samiti, Rupauli, District-Purnea 7.

Ajay Kumar Sharma Son of not known to the appellant Presently UpPramukh of Block Panchayat Samiti, Rupauli, District-Purnea 8.

Rita Devi Wife of Not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 9.

Kanti Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 10.

Dayanand Mandal son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 11.

Dimpal Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block 12.

Manoj Ram Son of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 13.

Lalita Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat

2/4 14.

Kanti Devi wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 15.

Dropadi Devi wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block 16.

Kunti Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 17.

Anjani Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 18.

Israil Son of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat Samiti, Rupauli through the Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Panchayat Samiti, Rupauli, P.O. and P.S.-Rupauli, District-Purnea 19.

Meera Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 20.

Rekha Devi wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 21.

Neelam Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block 22.

Subhash Rajak son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 23.

Riyazuddin son of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 24.

Aasif Ali Son of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 25.

Neelam Devi wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block

3/4 26.

Karelal Mahto son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 27.

Brahmdeo Mahto son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 28.

Rajesh Tiwary son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 29.

Vimal Kumar son of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 30.

Rajesh Kumar Pandit son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 31.

Triveni Mandal son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 32.

Pramod Kumar Mandal son of not known to the appellant Member of Block 33.

Preeti Devi Wife of not known to the appellant Member of Block Panchayat 34.

The State Election Commission, Bihar through the State Election Commissioner ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. S.B.K. Mngalam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ravinder Kumar, AC to AAG-6 For SEC Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

4/4 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-02-2021 This intra court appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.03.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13513 of 2018 (Neetu Kumari Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) by a learned Single Judge of this Court.

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.

Prayer allowed.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn clarifying that the question of law is left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/DKSU