Ujjawal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35548 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2021 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ujjawal Kumar Son Of Ramlalit Singh R/O Village- Gamharia, P.S.- Suppi, Dist.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.PK Pandey, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and section 25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, a country made pistol with four live cartridges, cash Rs.6600/- , motorcycle and mobile phone were recovered from his possession.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the motorcycle in question was purchased by him from one Amar Kumar. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He is in custody since 21.1.2021. Investigation is complete. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35548 of 2021(2) dt.10-09-2021 2/2 the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Suppi Police Station Case No. 18 of 2021 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T