← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28824/2024bail granted

Akshayvar Paswan @ Chaibar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-02Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28824 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-440 Year-2020 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== 1.

Akshayvar Paswan @ Chaibar Paswan S/o Mallu Paswan R/o Malhipur, P.S. - Chenari, Distt. - Rohtas, pin 821104 2.

Sunil Paswan S/o Mallu Paswan R/o Malhipur, P.S. - Chenari, Distt. - Rohtas, pin 821104 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Indu Devi W/o Nanhek Paswan R/o Malhipur, P.S. - Chenari, Distt. - Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 440 of 2023 offences punishable under Sections 323, 354, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per complaint case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, these petitioners abused and assaulted the complainant and also tried to outrage the modesty of her. It is further alleged that petitioners snatched Mangalsutra and cash of Rs. 6,000/-.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28824 of 2024(2) dt.02-09-2024 2/2 submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics. Further submission is that due to dispute over the drainage of water, a simple maarpit took place between the parties. Both the parties are next door neighbours. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. No specific over act is against the petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the bail application.

6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Complaint Case No. 440 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T