Patna High CourtMJC/17/2015dismissed

Sobha Kant Roy v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-06-24Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.17 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16154 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Sobha Kant Roy son of Fakir Roy, Resident of village- Dudahi, P.S Babubarahi, District Madhubani, (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the then Principle, Human Resource Development Department Patna namely Mr. Amarjeet Kumr Sinha.

2. The then District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal Madhubani namely Mr. Chandra Bhushan Dubedi.

3. The then Director Primary Education, Human Resource Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Mr. Ashutosh.

4. The then District Magistrate, Madhubani namely Mr. Girbal Dayal Singh.

5. The then District Superintendent of Education Madhubani namely Mr. Manoj Kumar.

6. The then Block Development Officer, Babubarahi Madhubani namely Md. Murshid Ansari.

7. The then Block Education Extension Officer, Babubarahi Madhubani namely Mr. Parsudhram Mochi.

8. The then Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Murhadi, Babubarahi Madhubani namely Smt. Sadhana Devi.

9. The then Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Murhadi, Babubarahi, Madhubani namely Mr. Ganga Raut.

10. Md. Shaukat son of Md. Ali Residing at village- Siswa (Barahi), P.SPhulparas, District- Madhubani. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC25 A. Ujjwal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Ultimately the order passed by this Court has been complied with by a reasoned order passed by the District Appellate Tribunal which is Annexure to the

Patna High Court MJC No.17 of 2015 (4) dt.24-06-2015 supplementary show cause.

In such view of the matter, there is no need to proceed with the matter. Accordingly this application is dismissed. It goes without saying that if the petitioner would file a proper application for certified copy the authority will be obliged to supply the same.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U