Rahul Bhindwar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22767 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2019 Thana- LAUKAHA DistrictMadhubani ====================================================== 1.

Rahul Bhindwar, aged about 32 years, Son of Chandradev Bhindavar, Resident of village- Ekamma, P.S. Laukaha District- Madhubani. 2.

Lal Babu Bhindwar @ Amardeep Bhindwar, aged about 28 years, male Son of Chandradev Bhindavar, Resident of village- Ekamma, P.S. Laukaha District- Madhubani.

3.

Raudi Yadav aged about 40 years, male Son of Bhage Yadav, Resident of village- Ekamma, P.S. Laukaha District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 341, 323, 353, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 12 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against two named and 15-20 unknown persons. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation attributed individually. There is no overt act of any assault by the petitioners. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22767 of 2019(2) dt.10-04-2019 2/2 the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 12 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T