Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Ritesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25926 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-737 Year-2021 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== RITESH KUMAR SINGH @ RITESH SINGH Son of Shree Parmanand Singh Permanent Resident of - A/19, Bela Bhawan, Veersha Nagar, Zone No.- 1 B, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand, Pin Code - 831004, Present Resident of - C/o Rakesh Kumar, First Floor, Urmila Niwas, Kaliket Nagar, Near Annapurna Kirana Store, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-10-2023 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State. It appears from the record that for the last three consecutive occasions, the petitioner has been seeking adjournments somehow or the other reason and today also no one on behalf of the petitioner paid heed to address the Court on repeated calls which appears to be deliberate and intentional act of the petitioner or it could be said that the petitioner is evading from the burden of compliance of the earlier order dated 07.07.2023 by which he had been granted ad-interim relief with specific direction in paragraph-8 of the said order that the petitioner shall
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25926 of 2023(6) dt.04-10-2023 2/2 deposit first installment of Rs. 300000/-, as agreed by him, within a period of one month from the date of the order, despite that petitioner has chosen not comply the order of this Court even after passing almost three months from the date of the order, which was passed on 07.07.2023. In view of the aforesaid, this application is being dismissed for want of prosecution on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed for nonprosecution on behalf of the petitioner. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T