Patna High CourtCR. REV./835/2005dismissed

Inner Singh @ Indradeo Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-08-11Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 835 of 2005 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -0 Year- null Thana -null District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================== Inner Singh @ Indradeo Singh, Son of Chathu Singh, Resident of Village-Desri Tola Chak Mahamad, P.S.-Desri, District-Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sharda Devi, Wife of Kira Singh, Resident of Village-Desri, Tola Chak Momad, P.S.-Desri, District-Vaishali.

.... .... Respondent/s with ======================================================== Criminal Revision No. 825 of 2006 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -0 Year- null Thana -null District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================== Bhagwat Singh, Son of Inner Deo Singh, Resident of Village-Desari Tola Chak Mohamad, P.S.-Desri, District-Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sharda Devi, Wife of Kira Singh, Resident of Village-Desri, Tola Chak Momad, P.S.-Desri, District-Vaishali.

.... .... Respondent/s ======================================================== Appearance :

(In CR. REV. No. 835 of 2005) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyam Sunder Sinha Shyam, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. APP.

(In CR. REV. No. 825 of 2006) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. APP.

======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-08-2015 The Petitioners seek revision of the judgment of conviction in appeal dated 14.05.2004 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.835 of 2005 dt.11-08-2015 Criminal Appeal No. 21/91/16/2001, by which he has affirmed the judgment dated 04.02.1991 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Complaint Case No. 1153 of 1982 (Tr. No. 104 of 1991), by which he has convicted the Petitioners under Section 452 IPC and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for six months respectively. Having gone through the impugned judgment, I do not find any justification for interference with the same.

However, considering the period of custody and the date of occurrence, the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by the Petitioners.

With the aforesaid modification in sentence, the Applications stand dismissed.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T