Sintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26873 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2024 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sintu Kumar S/o- Late Lakhan Prasad Village- Pathara Ps- Guraru Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Rinki Kumari W/o- Sintu Kumar Village- Pathara Ps- Guraru Dist- Gaya, A/P- Shailwan Tole koiri bigha Ps- Madanpur Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the opposite party no.2 and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 294 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 427, 379, 498(A), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 D.P. Act.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have submitted that now they are ready to settle the dispute.

4. Without going into the merits of the matter, petitioner is granted provisional anticipatory bail for a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the event or surrender before the learned trial court on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26873 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 294 of 2024.

5. The concerned Court is directed to make suitable efforts for the purpose of conciliation between the parties.

6. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

7. If an amicable resolution is worked out within six months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional anticipatory bail.

8. If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the learned trial court, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.

9. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) alok/- U T