Sanjay Ram @ Bakuli Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23396 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Sanjay Ram @ Bakuli Ram S/o- Aklu Ram resident of village- Torni PsShiv Sagar District-Rohtas 2.
Anil Ram S/o- Aklu Ram resident of village- Torni Ps- Shiv Sagar DistrictRohtas 3.
Sanjay Ram S/o- Late Bhuwan Ram resident of village- Torni Ps- Shiv Sagar District-Rohtas 4.
Arun Ram S/o- Late Bhuwan Ram resident of village- Torni Ps- Shiv Sagar District-Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Shiv-Sagar P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The allegation against the petitioners is of causing assault to the informant and his family members, leading to serious injuries sustained to four persons.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners taking this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23396 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/3 Court through the written report has contended that omnibus nature of allegation has been levelled against altogether 11 persons, including the petitioners that they have assaulted the informant and others by means of lathi, danda and iron rod. Out of four persons, who have sustained injuries, two of them received simple injuries, whereas two persons, namely, Kundan Kumar and Kusum Kumari have sustained grievous injuries, but the injury report which is marked as Annexure-P/2 suggest that they are no non-vital part of the body. It is further contended that on the premise of a land dispute, both the parties have entered into a free fight resulting into injuries to the persons of both the sides. The petitioners bear fair antecedent and they undertake before this Court that they will fully co-operate in the investigation or in the proceeding of the Court and would not indulge in such kind of offences in future.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that apart from the fact that the petitioners have actively participated in the crime, four persons have sustained injuries, out of which two of them have sustained grievous injuries.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the omnibus nature of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23396 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 3/3 allegation and the fact that the grievous injury allegedly sustained to two of the persons are on non-vital part of the body, coupled with their fair antecedent and the undertaking before this Court, let the petitioners above named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with ShivSagar P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- U T