Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26753/2025bail rejected

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-16Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26753 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2024 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Suraj Kumar S/o- Kari Paswan Village- Chamtha Chinytal Bandhapar PsBachhawara District-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bachhawara P.S. Case No. 354 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 127(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and specific allegation of stabbing is against Rohit and the petitioner is alleged to have snatched the golden chain of the son of the informant, who fell on account of stabbing by Rohit.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is a specific allegation against Rohit of stabbing the son of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26753 of 2025(2) dt.16-05-2025 2/2 the informant who fell and thereafter this petitioner is alleged to have snatched his golden chain. It is submitted that the petitioner could have avoided the occurrence, but then it appears that on account of his presence, Rohit felt emboldened to commit the occurrence.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T