Wilson v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26736 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2022 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== WILSON SON OF SHRIKANT PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- TELHARA, P.S.- TELHARA, DISTRICT- NALANDA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 147, 148, 149, 353, 337, 188 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

4. The informant alleges that candidates have come for appointment as teacher, but on verification, their educational documents and other certificates were found forged, next alleges that some anti-social elements came and started pelting stones and thus the accused persons including the petitioner taking advantage of the situation fled, but one candidate was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26736 of 2023(2) dt.18-08-2023 2/3 apprehended who was handed over to the police.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that as to how the informant on the date of selection itself came to know that the educational documents submitted by the petitioner are forged and fabricated. The learned counsel asserts and submits that petitioner was not trying to seek appointment based on forged and fabricated certificates. It is next submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner seeking explanation, then perhaps the present FIR would not have been instituted.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laheri (Nalanda)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26736 of 2023(2) dt.18-08-2023 3/3 P.S. Case No. 136 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T