Md Murshid @ Murshid Ali @ Md Murshid Ali v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23954 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
Md Murshid @ Murshid Ali @ Md Murshid Ali Son of Late Aziz Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar. 2.
Sahjadi Khatoon W/o Md. Murshid Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar.
3.
Md. Afazal Ali Son of Murshid Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar.
4.
Md. Umar @ Chhotu Ali Son of Murshid Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar.
5.
Md. Gulab Ali Son of Murshid Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar.
6.
Md. Aman Aloam @ Aman @ Aman AQli @ Md. Aman Ali Son of Murshid Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar. 7.
Md. Shariff Ali Son of Murshid Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar.
8.
Anjum Khatoon W/o Shariff Ali Resident of Village - Athgama, P.S.- Falka, Distt.- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ram Sumiran Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard both parties.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against petitioners is of commission of torture and harassment for dowry.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23954 of 2022(4) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are in-laws of the informant and there is general and omnibus allegation of torture and harassment against them. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
Counsel for informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioners are named in the FIR and there is allegation of commission of torture and harassment against them.
Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that petitioners are in-laws and there is general and omnibus allegation, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia (Bhagalpur) in connection with Naugachia (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 13 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T