Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22196 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1547 Year-2023 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Arvind Kumar, aged about 27 years, male, Son Of Rambali Sah, Resident of Village- Jhaphan Udan, P.S. -Ahiyapur, District -Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md. Raghib Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Ahiyapur P.S Case No. 1547 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant with the butt of pistol and robbed his essentials.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that this is a second bail application of the petitioner. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 18.09.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 43957 of 2024. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22196 of 2025(6) dt.22-08-2025 2/2 is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 23.01.2024 having three antecedents as stated in para three of the petition.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Upon perusal of the Status report vide letter no.106 dated 10.07.2025 sent by the Trial Court, it appears that five witnesses have already been examined and rest three witnesses have been summoned and the trial is likely to be concluded within one month. Therefore, considering the status report sent by the Trial Court, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby again rejected.

7. However, if the trial is not completed within one month as observed by the learned trial Court, then the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and the trial Court is directed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

8. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby disposed off.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Sunnykr/- U T