Kishan Das And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28959 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -249 Year- 2017 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Kishan Das, son of late Bundi Das,
2. Pritam Kuamr Das, son of Janki Das,
3. Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Kumar Das, son of Janki Das,
4. Amit Kumar Das, son of Janki Das,
5. Parwati Devi, w/o Janki Das,
6. Bibha Devi, w/o Pradeep Kumar Das,
7. Chameli Devi, w/o Kishan Das,
8. Rajeev Das @ Rajeev Kumar Das, son of Kadamlal Das, all are of village-Matiya, P.S.- Sadar (Muffasil), District-Purnia. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 29-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.
The Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.249 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 342, 323, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506/34 Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against all these petitioners. All the injuries found on the person of the injured are simple in nature, which is apparent from Annexure-2.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28959 of 2017 (2) dt.29-06-2017 2/2 the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.249 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.