Kare Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1792 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7126 of 2011 =========================================================== Kare Lal Yadav Son of Late Tetar Yadav Resident of Village - Soti Chak, P.O. - Kadra Chak, P.S. - Shambhuganj, District - Banka, Presently nominated as UpMantri of Bihar Local BOdies Employees Federation, Bihar, Patna of Munger Nagar Parishad Unit, Munger .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Dr. S. Sidharth, The Principal Secretary Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. Dr. S. Sidharth, The Principal Secretary Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, The Deputy Secretary - cum- Director, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
4. Sri Jay Prakash Mandal, The Special Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
5. Sri Narendra Kumar Singh, The District Magistrate, Munger, District - Munger
6. Sri Prabhat Kumar Sinha, The Municipal Executive Officer, Munger Nagar Parishad, Munger
7. Pratap Bhanu Kumar, The Treasury Officer Munger, District - Munger
8. Sri Sanjay Kumar, The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh, Adv For the Accountant General, Bihar : Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, Adv For the Nagar Parishad : Mr. Ambika Bhagat, Adv For the State : Mr. Anirban Kundu, SC 24 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-07-2017 From the supplementary show cause filed by the officials of the Municipal Corporation, Munger, it is seen that the claim of the employee concern has been settled and a total payment towards salary and other monetary benefits amounting to Rs. 1,75,98,751/- has been paid on 25.04.2016.
Patna High Court MJC No.1792 of 2014 dt.14-07-2017 2/2 Keeping in view the aforesaid, now no further indulgence into the matter is called for. In case, the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the settlement of the pensionery claim after payment of salary, he shall have liberty to raise the same, in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 19/07/2017 Transmission Date NA