Guddu @ Bablu Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.80343 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2008 Thana- KAJRAILICHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Guddu @ Bablu Thakur, son of Late Ganesh Thakur, resident of VillagePawai, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhuranand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with S. Tr. No. 402 of 2015, arising out of Kajraili P.S. Case No. 1 of 2008, for the offence under Sections 364, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier granted bail, however, his bail bonds was cancelled on account of the fact that Pairvi was not done on behalf of the petitioner in the case. He submits that the trial has commenced. The petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2018. Considering the fact that earlier the petitioner was granted bail, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80343 of 2018(2) dt.30-01-2019 2/2 connection with S. Tr. No. 402 of 2015, arising out of Kajraili P.S. Case No. 1 of 2008 with the condition that the petitioner shall physically present on each and every date fixed by the trial court and in the event the petitioner fails to appear in two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds. At the same time, the court below is also directed to conclude the trial expeditiously preferably within a period of six months.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U T