Bare @ Lav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24170 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2020 Thana- KANHAULI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== BARE @ LAV KUMAR S/o Bhikhari Ray R/o Village- Ramnagra, P.S.- Kanhauli, Distt.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-07-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kanhauli P.S. Case No. 126 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 288 litres Nepali Saufi liquor from the car in question. The petitioner and other co-accused succeeded in fleeing away from the spot. The name of the petitioner has been surfaced by the local villagers.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24170 of 2022(2) dt.29-07-2022 2/3 petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2022 and bears criminal antecedent of one case of similar nature. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Learned counsel further submits that nothing has recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner was not apprehended on the spot.
The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, the petitioner was not apprehended on the spot, charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Exclusive Special Excise Court-I, Sitamarhi in connection with Kanhauli P.S. Case No. 126 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24170 of 2022(2) dt.29-07-2022 3/3 the affidavit in bail application.
(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) minu/- U T