Dablu Yadav @ Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.79959 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-675 Year-2014 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Dablu Yadav @ Prince Kumar, son of Nand Kishore Yadav, resident of village-Barsam P.S.-Sour Bazar, District-Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 17-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Madhepura P.S. Case No. 675 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 395 Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that Petitioner is in custody since 28.05.2015 in this case. Petitioner is not named in the written report. There is no recovery from possession of the petitioner. No Test Identification Parade has been held. Name of this petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused, Rahul Kumar and Aman Kumar.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79959 of 2018(2) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 675 of 2014, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.
Further, (i) the petitioner will remain present on each and every date of trial, (ii) His absence on two consecutive date(s) without any reasonable cause will make his bail bond liable to be cancelled, and (iii) the petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses in any way and will not hamper the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- Rohit Kr.
U T