Patna High CourtCWJC/15255/2005dismissed

Triloki Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-26Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15255 of 2005 ====================================================== Triloki Singh son of late Deo Narayan Singh, resident of village- Khairma, P.O. + P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Jamui.

3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Jamui.

4. The Circle Officer, Jamui.

5. Pradeep Kumar Singh @ Gunjan.

6. Swardeep Kumar @ Goddan

7. Amardeep Kumar Singh @ Fudanjeet Singh, All are sons of Harnarayan Singh, resident of Vill.- Gadi Katauna, P.O. Katouna, P.S. Mallahpur, Distt. Jamui.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baidya Nath Thakur Mr. Shankar Kr. Thakur For the Respondent No.1 to 4 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, AC to PAAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2016 The present matter arises out of a mutation proceeding. The claim of mutation raised on behalf of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question, fully detailed in paragraph-1 of the writ petition itself, was rejected by the original authority by order dated 14.08.2001 (Annexure-3). The appeal and revision preferred on behalf of the petitioner against the order passed by the original authority have been dismissed by the impugned appellate order dated 27.11.2003 (Annexure-5) and the revisional order dated 10.08.2005 (Annexure-7). Apparently, the claim of mutation raised on behalf of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question have been rejected by all the three statutory authorities by recording concurrent finding of facts.

In above view of the matter, this Court does not find any good ground to interfere with the order impugned. The writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.15255 of 2005 (13) dt.26-02-2016 2/2 petition seems to be completely misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, the petitioner, if so advised, shall be at liberty to approach the civil court of competent jurisdiction for getting his right and title declared over the lands in question. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U