Md. Idris And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30070 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -821 Year- 2016 Thana -KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE DistrictKHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Md. Idris son of Late Md. Sadik Marhum

2. Bibi Rizwana Khatoon wife of Md. Idris, both resident of village Marar South P.S. Morkahi, District- Khagaria .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Bihar

2. Rehana Khatoon wife of Imran D/o Md. Talmul, resident of village Marar South, P.S. Morkahi, District-Khagaria .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 821C of 2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30070 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 the petitioners. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner no.1 is father-in-law of the victim and petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law of the victim. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. The petitioners have further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 821C of 2016 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T