Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79473/2018bail rejected

Vikash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-02Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79473 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2017 Thana- MAHISHI District- Saharsa ====================================================== Vikash Yadav S/o Kamleshwari Yadav @ Kameshwar Yadav R/o village - Ghoghsam, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiarpur, District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shiva Shankar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Asharaf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahisi (Jalai) P.S. Case No. 62 of 2017, registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of S.D.J.M., Saharsa.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that regarding snatching of motorcycle and two mobiles of the informant and his maternal uncle, Mahisi (Jalai) P.S. Case No. 62 of 2017 was instituted against the unknown but in course of investigation, one Chandan Sah was apprehended in Bakhtiyarpur (Balba Hat) P.S. Case No. 123 of 2017, in which, he confessed his guilt saying

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79473 of 2018(4) dt.02-05-2019 2/2 his involvement in the present case and also disclosed that looted motorcycle and mobile is at the house of Nagendra Yadav. Thereafter, police recovered looted motorcycle and mobile from the house of Nagendra Yadav, who also disclosed the name of petitioner and Aman Panjiyar showing the involvement in the present case.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T