Munna Yadav @ Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79354 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2018 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar * ====================================================== Munna Yadav @ Munna Kumar, Son of Akshay Yadav, Resident of villageKirani, Police Station- Nawanagar, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner (husband of the deceased) is to have killed the daughter of the informant along with F.I.R. named accused for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that at the time of alleged occurrence, petitioner was in Surat with consent of his wife for their livelihood. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.07.2018.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79354 of 2018(3) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 113 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T