Saddam Ansari @ Saddam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27038 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2024 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Saddam Ansari @ Saddam S/O Sattar Miyan @ Md. Sattar Resident of Village- Karma, P.S- Jahjha, District- Jamui. 2.

Mansoor Miyan @ Md. Mansoor Ansari @ Mansoor S/O Sattar Miyan @ Md. Sattar Resident of Village- Karma, P.S- Jahjha, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 23.06.2024, while informant was getting the land appertaining to Khata No. 178, Khesra No. 3522, Area 7.125 Katha measured in the meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, armed with sticks, swords, axes, tangi and iron rods, came there and assaulted informant and others as a result

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27038 of 2025(2) dt.13-05-2025 2/3 of which several persons sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute between the parties, a free fight took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. There are general and omnibus allegations and there is no specific accusation of overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 256 of 2024, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27038 of 2025(2) dt.13-05-2025 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T