Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26051/2025bail rejected

Vishwanath Das v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26051 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-637 Year-2022 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Vishwanath Das S/O Hari Chandra Das R/O Village- Bahoritola, Prem Nagar, Ward No. 10, P.S- Garha and Distt.- Sitamarhi, Bihar Pin Code- 843323. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarvottam Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 32, 36 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per prosecution case, 2604.12 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from different vehicles.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be owner of the vehicle in question. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26051 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that huge quantity of liquor was recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner is registered owner.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that huge quantity of illicit liquor was recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner is registered owner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T