Ranjeet Kumar @ Laltu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33412 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2021 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR @ LALTU KUMAR S/o Raj Kumar Yadav R/o villageDamgara, P.S.- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murlidhar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 279 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 179 and other sections of the MV Act.

As per the prosecution case, petitioner and two other persons were arrested with a stolen motorcycle. Petitioner was driving the motorcycle at the relevant time. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has claimed clean antecedent and he is in custody since 18.2.2021. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33412 of 2021(2) dt.03-09-2021 2/2 the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Madhepura Police Station Case No. 106 of 2021 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T