Deep Lal Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16164 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Deep Lal Sah son of Sukdeo Sah Resident of village and P.O. Raksa Purbari Tola, P.S. Karja, District - Muzaffarpur, the retired Clerk, Minor Irrigation Division, Hajipur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur. 2.

Ram Lobhit Singh son of Late Ram Gulam Thakur Resident of village - Alampur Kusairi, P.O. Lakhni, P.S. Bidupur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur, the retired Clerk, Minor Irrigation Division, Hajipur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur.

3.

Krishna Kumar Singh Arya son of Keshav Prasad Resident of Mohalla - Durga Chowk, Indrapuri, Keshri Nagar, P.S. Patliputra, District - Patna, the retired Clerk, Minor Irrigation Division, Hajipur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur.

4.

Arun Kumar son of Mahendra Rai Resident of village - Barauti (Gangtapar) P.O. Bidupur (R.S.), P.S. Rajapakar, District - Vaishali at Hajipur, the retired Typist, Minor Irrigation Division, Hajipur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, patna..

3.

The Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Minor Irrigation Division, Hajipur.

5.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. U.S.S.Singh, GP-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2024 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. U.S.S. Singh, learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CWJC No.16164 of 2015(5) dt.05-02-2024 2/2 during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and as such the writ petitioner has become infructuous and accordingly he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U