← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24126/2025bail granted

Nivas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-02Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24126 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-366 Year-2024 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Nivas Kumar Son of Pappu Gop R/O Village- Vijawanpar, P.S.- Deepnagar, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 366 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case is in short is that while at about 9:25 P.M., the informant was traveling on his motorcycle suddenly 3 persons overtook him and on the point of pistol, snatched away around Rs.5,300/- and a mobile and then had further transferred Rs.19,000/- on 4 occasions to a certain mobile number, however, they did not loot the motorcycle on which the victim was travelling.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24126 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/3 petitioner is not named in the FIR and his named has surfaced during course of the investigation on the basis of the fact that there were 11 phone calls made on the date of occurrence on phone number of the co-accused, namely, Manish Kumar apart from that there is nothing to show that the petitioner was involved in the aforesaid incident. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that TIP parade has not yet been done and petitioner has not been identified and no incriminating article has been recovered or amount is stated to have been sent to him which has been alleged in the FIR. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 07.11.2024.

5. Learned APP for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and stated that the petitioner and others are working as a gang and have been committing crime through online and other modes.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and considering the fact that barring the 11 calls being made by petitioner to co-accused, Manish Kumar nothing incriminating has been recovered or any amount having been received by the petitioner is found and also the period of custody undergone, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on deposition of Rs. 20,000/- in the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24126 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 3/3 Court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif in connection with Deepanagar P.S. Case No. 366 of 2024 subject to the the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court.

(iii) In case the prosecution is found the petitioner's involvement in similar nature of allegation after his release and in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) ajay/- U T