Raj Narayan Pandit @ Raj Narayan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24121 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2016 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAJ NARAYAN PANDIT @ RAJ NARAYAN KUMAR S/o Kashi Pandit @ Kashnath Pandit R/o Village - Thikha Bankat, P.S. Pakaridayal, Dist. East champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302/34, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has committed no offence, as alleged in the F.I.R., and entire F.I.R. is false and concocted. He further submits that it is an error of record that process of Section 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. has been issued.

However, in the impugned order, learned Sessions Judge has referred different paragraphs of the case diary and stated that process under Section 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued against this petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24121 of 2022(3) dt.16-11-2022 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and same is, accordingly, rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T