Ramprit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24506 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Ramprit Singh S/o- Late Bhutto Singh R/o- Belsandi Tara, P.S.- Bibhutiipur, District- Samastipur.

2.

Shail Kumari @ Shailya Kumari Devi W/o- Ramprit Singh R/o- Belsandi Tara, P.S.- Bibhutiipur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 341, 323, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being father-in-law and mother-in-law. It is next submitted that petitioners, during the course of investigation, were given the benefit of Section 41(1)(b) of the Cr.P.C. and they cooperated in the investigation, but then police never felt the need of arresting the petitioners, it is next submitted that after investigation, the police in a mechanical

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24506 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 manner submitted charge sheet based on which cognizance came to be taken, thus, petitioners apprehend their arrest. It is next submitted that when police, during the course of investigation, never felt the need of arresting the petitioners whether it would be prudent for this Court to send the petitioners to jail based on an order of cognizance.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Samastipur Mahila (Women) P.S. Case No. 30 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T