Patna High CourtCR. MISC./881/2019bail granted

Akhilesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-21Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.881 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2018 Thana- VAISALI GRP CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar Singh s/o Madan Singh Resident of Khriya P.S-Town Police Station, Gopalganj, District-Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kant For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Rail Sonepur(Hajipur) P.S. Case No. 40 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8/20/22 NDPS Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 8 Kg Ganja from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 08.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.881 of 2019(3) dt.21-02-2019 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial MagistrateRail Sonepur (Hajipur) in connection with Rail Sonepur(Hajipur) P.S. Case No. 40 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U