Uma Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23515 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-523 Year-2021 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== UMA YADAV Son of Siya Yadav (due to slip of pen name of Father has been mentioned as Gopal Yadav in a order impugned) ,Resident of Village - Gulariya Chak, Post office - Musi, Police Station- Tekari, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 29-07-2022 Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 523 of 202021 lodged under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that the marriage of informant's daughter was solemnized in the year 2016. There was demand of dowry from the side of in-laws family of his daughter. It has been alleged that the son-in-law has developed illicit relation with another lady, namely, Manju Devi, therefore, she was subjected to cruelty. Panchayati was taken place
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23515 of 2022(2) dt.29-07-2022 2/3 thereafter the in-laws family of her daughter brought her and started living together with them. On 13.10.2021, at about 9 PM, the informant received a call that his daughter ran away from her matrimonial house. On 14.10.2021, the informant reached the Sasural of her daughter then got information that the named accused persons have killed and cremated her dead body in the river thereafter the present case has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the brother of the father-in-law of the deceased. He is completely separate in mess and business. He further submits that from the F.I.R. itself transpires that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. All the allegations are general and omnibus.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the husband of the deceased, who is solely respectable towards his wife, is already in custody. He further submits that the present petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2022 and having clean antecedent and charge sheet has already been filed in this case.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23515 of 2022(2) dt.29-07-2022 3/3 the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateVI in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 523 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions:
With this observation, the bail application stands allowed.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) guddu/- U