Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.80524 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2011 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar son of Sri Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Resident of Sedha, P.S. Tarari, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC registered in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 201/2011.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as he happens to be the then Sub Registrar. It is submitted that the petitioner was not required to examine the title and in any event the informant's Title Suit No. 253 of 1982 has since been dismissed by learned Sub Judge-II, Danapur, Patna in terms of judgment dated 18.03.2017 (Annexure-7). It is submitted that the vendor as well as the purchaser have been granted anticipatory bail.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM I,Danapur, Patna, in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 201/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80524 of 2018(2) dt.22-01-2019 2/2 Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. Chandran/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T