← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1230/2025disposed

Parmeshwar Rao v. Dipak Kumar Singh, The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary,

2025-06-27Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1230 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.590 of 2025 ====================================================== Parmeshwar Rao S/O- Munshi Rao, R/O- Ward No.- 10, Rampur, Dumariya, P.S.- Shikarpur, Dist.-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Dipak Kumar Singh, The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Bihar. 2.

Preeti Tongria, The Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, State of Bihar. 3.

Dinesh Kumar Rai, The District Magistrate, West Champaran. 4.

Harihar Nath Jha, The District Education Officer, West Champaran. 5.

Manish Kumar, The Panchayati Raj Officer, Bettiah. 6.

Sudhanshu Shekhar, The Circle Officer, Narkatiaganj. 7.

Suraj Kumar Singh, The Block Development Officer, Narkatiaganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Adesh Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present contempt petition has been filed for noncompliance of the order dated 20.01.2025 passed in CWJC No. 590 of 2025.

3. Learned counsel for the State has filed a show cause stating therein that as per direction of this Court, the District Magistrate, West Champaran (Respondent No. 3) has considered

Patna High Court MJC No.1230 of 2025 dt.27-06-2025 2/2 the representation of the petitioner and disposed of the same vide order dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure-C) after hearing the petitioner and other person by a speaking order in accordance with law.

4. Learned counsel for the State states that in view of the aforesaid, the order of this Court has been complied with.

5. The contempt petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner, if so advised, he may challenge the order dated 17.05.2025.

6. The contempt petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 30.06.2025 Transmission Date N.A.