Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29232/2016disposed

Pramod Singh @ Parmod Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-22Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29232 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2015 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Pramod Singh @ Parmod Singh Son of Gorakh Singh

2. Kunjan Singh, Son of Gajendra Singh, Both residents of VillageBhokhari, P.S.- Kargahar (Sidhi), District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-02-2017 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners have renewed his prayer for anticipatory bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147,148,149,323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged that the petitioners caused fire arm injury to the nephew of the informant namely Himanshu Kumar. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the injury has been found to be simple. There is counter version of the occurrence where the petitioners' side also received injury. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29232 of 2016 (2) dt.22-02-2017 2/2 co accused Gorakh Nath Singh alias Gorakh Singh has been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 23445 of 2015. Now, the informant has entered into compromise.

Be that as it may, this court is not inclined to revise the earlier order. However, in view of the nature of injury and the counter version of the occurrence coupled with the Statement made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, it is a case for consideration of the prayer of the petitioners for regular bail by the learned court below in case the petitioners surrender within six weeks from today and pray for bail in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 78 of 2015 pending in the court of learned J.M. Ist Class, Rohtas at Sasaram. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this application stands disposed of.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anil/- U