Patna High CourtMJC/2508/2011disposed

Dharmendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.

2017-02-16Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2508 of 2011 =========================================================== Dharmendra Mahto, son of Kusheshwar Mahto, resident of Village- Pidhauli, P.S. Teghra, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna, Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh

2. The Director, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna Mr. Ashutosh Kumar

3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai, Mr. Jitendra Srivastava

4. The District Development Commissioner, Begusarai, Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Thakur

5. District Educational Office cum District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai, Mr. Yogesh Mishra

6. The Block Development Officer, Block Teghra, District- Begusarai, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar

7. The Block Education Officer, Block- Teghra, District- Begusarai Smt. Shivani Tiwary

8. Mr. Ramadhar Jha, Mukhiya Panchayat Raj Pidhauli, Block- Teghra, DistrictBegusarai

9. Mr. Heera Singh Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Pidhauli Block Teghra, District- Begusarai

10. Smt. Meena Kumari, Headmaster, Middle School, Pidhauli Panchayat Pidhauli, Block- Teghra, District- Begusarai .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-02-2017 This Court vide order dated 23rd of June, 2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1113 of 2010 set aside the order dated 20th of August, 2009 and directed the petitioner to continue in service. In the show-cause filed, it has been pointed out that the petitioner has been paid his due salary in his account and that the order of this Court has been fully complied with.

Patna High Court MJC No.2508 of 2011 dt.16-02-2017 2/2 In view of the reply filed, no further orders are called for in the present Contempt Petition.

The Contempt Petition stands disposed of having rendered infructuous.

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 21.02.2017 Transmission Date