← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26164/2024bail rejected

Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26164 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2023 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ranjeet Yadav SON OF Siya Sharan Yadav RESIDENT OF VILLAGERAMDAHIYAPAR, PS- RAHUI, DIST- NALANDA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

THE BIHAR MINERALS (CONSESSION PREVENTION OF ILLIGAL MINING TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE) DEPT.,BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 379, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per the prosecution case , a raid was conducted against the illegal transporting and storage of the sand and it was found that 700 cubic feet sand and 2200 cubic sand were stored in different places. It is further alleged that the local persons have disclosed the name of this petitioner and coaccused Kundan Kumar who were involved in the aforesaid illegal storage and transportation and due to this they also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26164 of 2024(4) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 caused revenue loss of Rs. 74375/- and Rs. 2,33,750/- to the government.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion . He is neither owner nor driver of the vehicle in question .

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail ans submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R., and he has got five criminal antecedents of similar nature .

6. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and gravity of offence , prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T