Harendra Kumar @ Harendra Prasad Sah @ Hrendra Pd. Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1149 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-538 Year-2018 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ======================================================

1. Harendra Kumar @ Harendra Prasad Sah @ Hrendra Pd. Sah, son of Bilat Prasad Sah.

2. Bilat Prasad Sah @ Bilat Pd. Sah, son of Parmeshwar Sah

3. Pappu Kumar Sah @ Pappu Sah, son of Umesh Sah.

4. Ranjan Roy @ Ranjan Kumar Roy, son of Ambika Prasad Roy. Petitioner no. 1 and 2 resident of village- Station Chowk, Sri Krishnapuri Colony.

Petitioner no. 3 and 4 resident of village- Kothihat Ward No. 14 Forbesganj, All P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2019 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Forbesganj P.S.Case No. 538 of 2018 registered under Sections 120B, 384, 385, 386, 388, 465, 420 and 501 of the Indian penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of they have taken the son of the informant who is running a computer business and after two days, he returned, thereafter they made demand of extortion. It is alleged that son of the informant was kept in the house of Pappu Kumar Sah (petitioner no. 3).

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and except petitioner no. 1, other petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1149 of 2019(2) dt.17-01-2019 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, so far petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are concerned, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to them. However, if they surrender within a period of six months and make prayer for regular bail, the same shall be considered on the basis of material available on record. So far as petitioner nos. 2, and 4 are concerned, they are, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 538 of 2018; subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With the above direction, this application stands disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T